Network Working Group
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) W. Hardaker
Internet-Draft
Request for Comments: 9906 USC/ISI
Intended status:
Category: Standards Track W. Kumari
Expires: 5 December 2025
ISSN: 2070-1721 Google
3 June
November 2025
Deprecate usage Usage of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC
draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-07
Abstract
This document retires the use of GOST R 34.10-2001 (mnemonic "ECC-
GOST") and GOST R 34.11-94 within DNSSEC.
RFC5933 (now historic)
RFC 5933 (Historic) defined the use of GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R
34.11-94 algorithms with DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC). This
document updates RFC5933 RFC 5933 by deprecating the use of ECC-GOST.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list It represents the consensus of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for a maximum publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of six months this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents obtained at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 5 December 2025.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9906.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info)
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Notation
2. Deprecating ECC-GOST algorithms Algorithms in DNSSEC . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Operational Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Appendix A.
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Appendix B. Current algorithm usage levels . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Appendix C. Github Version of this document . . . . . . . . . . 5
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1. Introduction
The use of the GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms are documented
in [RFC5933] and their use with
the DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) [RFC9364] was documented is
further described in
[RFC5933]. [RFC9364]. These two algorithms were deprecated
by the Orders of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and
Metrology of Russia (Rosstandart) in August 2012, 2012 and were superseded
by GOST 34.10-2012 and GOST 34.11-2012 34.11-2012, respectively. The use of
these newer two newer algorithms in DNSSEC is documented in [RFC9558] [RFC9558], and
their associated requirement levels are not changed by this document.
Thus, the use of GOST R 34.10-2001 (mnemonic GOST-ECC) "ECC-GOST") and GOST R
34.11-94 is no longer recommended for use in DNSSEC [RFC9364].
1.1. Requirements notation Notation
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. Deprecating ECC-GOST algorithms Algorithms in DNSSEC
The GOST R 34.11-94 [RFC5933] algorithm [RFC5933] MUST NOT be used when
creating DS Delegation Signer (DS) records. Validating resolvers MUST
treat GOST R 34.11-94 DS records as insecure. If no other DS records
of accepted cryptographic algorithms are available, the DNS records
below the delegation point MUST be treated as insecure.
The ECC-GOST [RFC5933] GOST R 34.10-2001 algorithm [RFC5933] (mnemonic "ECC-GOST") MUST
NOT be used when creating
DNSKEY DNS Public Key (DNSKEY) and RRSIG Resource Record
Signature (RRSIG) records. Validating resolvers MUST treat RRSIG
records created from DNSKEY records using these algorithms as an
unsupported algorithm. algorithms. If no other RRSIG records of accepted
cryptographic algorithms are available, the validating resolver MUST
consider the associated resource records as insecure.
3. Security Considerations
This document potentially increases the security of the DNSSEC
ecosystem by deprecating algorithms that are no longer recommended
for use.
4. Operational Considerations
This document removes support for ECC-GOST. Zone operators currently
making use of ECC-GOST based ECC-GOST-based algorithms should switch to algorithms
that remain supported. DNS registries should prohibit their clients
from uploading and publishing ECC-GOST based ECC-GOST-based DS records to ensure
that they are using algorithms which that are supported by DNSSEC
validators,
validators and so thus can be DNSSEC validated.
5. IANA Considerations
[Note to IANA, to be removed by
IANA has updated the RFC Editor: GOST R 34.10-2001 (12) entry in the "DNS
Security Algorithm Numbers" registry fields
listed above will be created by draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis.]
IANA is requested to set the "Use [DNSKEY-IANA] [RFC9904] as
follows:
Number: 12
Description: GOST R 34.10-2001 (DEPRECATED)
Mnemonic: ECC-GOST
Zone Signing: Y
Trans. Sec.: *
Use for DNSSEC Signing", "Use Signing: MUST NOT
Use for DNSSEC Validation", "Implement Validation: MUST NOT
Implement for DNSSEC Signing", and "Implement Signing: MUST NOT
Implement for DNSSEC Validation" columns Validation: MUST NOT
Reference: [RFC5933], Change the status of GOST Signature Algorithms
in DNSSEC in the DNS Security Algorithm Numbers
registry [DNSKEY-IANA] [draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis] for ECC-GOST
(12) IETF stream to MUST NOT. Note that previously the Historic
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-gost-dnssec-to-
historic/), and RFC 9906
Note: The "Use for DNSSEC Signing" and "Implement for DNSSEC
Delegation" columns were already set to MUST NOT.
IANA is requested to set has updated the "Use GOST R 34.11-94 (3) entry in the "Digest
Algorithms" registry [DS-IANA] as follows:
Value: 3
Description: GOST R 34.11-94 (DEPRECATED)
Use for DNSSEC Delegation", "Use Delegation: MUST NOT
Use for DNSSEC Validation", "Implement Validation: MUST NOT
Implement for DNSSEC Delegation", and "Implement Delegation: MUST NOT
Implement for DNSSEC Validation" columns of Validation: MUST NOT
Reference: [RFC5933], Change the "Digest Algorithms" registry
[DS-IANA] for status of GOST R 34.11-94 (3) to MUST NOT. Note that previously Signature Algorithms
in DNSSEC in the IETF stream to Historic
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-gost-dnssec-to-
historic/), and RFC 9906
Note: The "Use for DNSSEC Signing" and "Implement for DNSSEC
Delegation" columns were already set to MUST NOT.
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[DNSKEY-IANA]
IANA, "Domain Name System Security (DNSSEC) Algorithm
Numbers", n.d., <https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-
alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml>.
[draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis]
W., K., "DNS Security Algorithm Numbers", n.d.,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-
rfc8624-bis>.
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers>.
[DS-IANA] IANA, "Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Record (RR) Type
Digest "Digest Algorithms", n.d.,
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC5933] Dolmatov, V., Ed., Chuprina, A., and I. Ustinov, "Use of
GOST Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource
Records for DNSSEC", RFC 5933, DOI 10.17487/RFC5933, July
2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5933>.
[RFC9364] Hoffman, P., "DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC)", BCP 237,
RFC 9364, DOI 10.17487/RFC9364, February 2023,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9364>.
6.2. Informative References <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5933>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC9364] Hoffman, P., "DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC)", BCP 237,
RFC 9364, DOI 10.17487/RFC9364, February 2023,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9364>.
[RFC9904] Hardaker, W. and W. Kumari, "DNSSEC Cryptographic
Algorithm Recommendation Update Process", RFC 9904,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9904, November 2025,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9904>.
6.2. Informative References
[RFC9558] Makarenko, B. and V. Dolmatov, Ed., "Use of GOST 2012
Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records
for DNSSEC", RFC 9558, DOI 10.17487/RFC9558, April 2024,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9558>.
Appendix A.
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9558>.
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the comments and suggestions from the
following IETF participants in helping produce this document: Mark
Andrews, Steve Crocker, Brian Dickson, Peter Dickson, Thomas Graf,
Paul Hoffman, Russ Housely, Shumon Huque, Paul Hoffman, S S. Moonesamy, Peter Dickson, Peter
Thomassen, Stefan Ubbink, Paul Wouters, Tim Wicinski, Paul Wouters, and the many
members of the DNSOP working group Working Group that discussed this draft.
Appendix B. Current algorithm usage levels
The DNSSEC scanning project by Viktor Dukhovni and Wes Hardaker
highlights the current deployment of various algorithms on the
https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/ website.
<RFC Editor: please delete this section upon publication>
Appendix C. Github Version of this document
While this document is under development, it can be viewed, tracked,
fill here:
https://github.com/hardaker/draft-hardaker-dnsop-must-not-gost
<RFC Editor: please delete this section upon publication> specification.
Authors' Addresses
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI
Email: ietf@hardakers.net
Warren Kumari
Google
Email: warren@kumari.net